If you have read the Canon 1.4x EF Extender III Review, you will find the Canon EF 2x III Extender review familiar. The 2X imparted a much bigger hit on AF speed than the 1.4x. IMG8.src = 'https://media.the-digital-picture.com/Images/Other/Canon-Extender-EF-III/No-Extender-20x.jpg' These images were processed using the Standard Picture Style with a sharpness setting of "2" (very low). an extension tube installed between them makes the fit possible. Much the same story here with the 2x extenders. Because of that, most people only use Extenders when they absolutely need the extra reach AND have plenty of light to work with (like outdoors during the daytime). The mounted extender also shifts the lens weight forward slightly for a potential change of balance. Great link, thanks! I did some systematic test shots of a Coke can, two at 400mm and two at 300mm, with my new Canon 100-400mm mark ii lens and there was virtually ZERO difference between the shots with vs without the 1.4 - it was impressive! I would however use an extender if the sun is off at 90 degrees to my subject or more. Note that "AF precision remains the same as the Series II Extenders when the Series III Extenders are used with earlier extender-compatible EF lenses." Like the 2x II, the Canon EF 2x III Extender is weather-sealed and very-solidly-built - I know it's not an answer to your question, but I'd get a 1.4X III extender instead. As such, its often best to switch to manual focus when using an extender. Canon EF 600mm f/4 III with Canon extender 1,4 III? Yes if you appreciate better resolution. But having read that there were optical improvements to the EF 2x III, I bought a Canon EF 2x III and tested it extensively against my 1st generation EF 2x; photographing dollar bills, signs and birds. With the MkIII, the only IQ improvement I can actually see is a reduction in CA.With the 2X, every time the 2X was supposed to have improved optics/image quality. Shooting with the Canon EF 2x III Extender mounted results in reduction of autofocus speed. Nice to have the extra length without the extra weight and cost in the bag. Note that barrel distortion causes the center portion of the image (top image in the ISO 12233 tool) to be slightly enlarged, It really depends on your needs. A great lens will typically produce the best image quality when used with the 2x and There are obviously some caveats when using an extender like this most notably, youll lose one stop of light, so keep that in mind when planning your shots. Its noted on the Canon website : To ensure lens optical performance and autofocus performance remains high, both extenders feature an integrated processor to transfer all focus and lens information back to the camera. Stopping the lens down one to two stops usually improves the image quality of both the bare lens and the extended lens combination. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding. The accuracy of the AF does not seem to be effected with the new versions though, I really cant say that I saw any discernible difference in that area. I did not notice any differences in this regard. For that kind of scenario the 2x is still worth having but use it wisely ! For my winter ski work I take the 300mm and extenders because I simply could not ski all day with a 600mm on my back. Ultimately, whether or not the Canon 1st 4 extender is worth it depends on your specific needs and situation as a photographer. You can use natural light, artificial light, or a combination of both. The latest versions for DSLRs are the Extender EF 1.4x Mark III and the Extender EF 2x Mark III. They use the same high quality glass, antireflection coating, build durability and weather sealing as Canon's most expensive $14,000 lenses. I can answer but partly.i havent used Extender II but use Extender III , both 1.4x III and 2x III , with EF 300 mm F/2.8 L II lens on 5D Mark IV body.IQ with Extender 1.4x III is hardly affected. If you need a little extra reach, then the II is a great choice. (and this is of course only true when you do not want the entire native lens' FOV). (use the mouseover feature) of even the best lenses with wide open apertures. Canon EF 200mm f/2.8L II USM Lens MP-E 65mm f/2.8 1-5x Macro Photo Lens: Yes The 2xIII works nicely on the 70-200II however focusing speed is reduced by 50% so be aware of that. IMG3 = new Image(604, 404) The Canon Extender EF lenses are a group of teleconverter lenses made by Canon. EF 400mff /2..8 LUSMandIIa&b -EF28~105 mmf /35~ 4 .5 ~ 5 . Canon EF Extender 2X III Teleconverter #817 $240.04 Free shipping or Best Offer Canon EF Extender 2X III Teleconverter #340 $240.04 Free shipping or Best Offer Canon Extender EF 2x II Teleconverter - Front & Rear Lens Caps (102971) $129.95 0 bids $6.00 shipping 4d 11h Canon Extender EF 2x Teleconverter Lens for EF Mount From Japan [Excellent] On an APS-C sensor camera body, the effective focal length range is 150-600mm. It increases the focal length of a lens by a factor of 1.4x while still delivering superb image quality. Auto-suggest helps you quickly narrow down your search results by suggesting possible matches as you type. I find the AF slows significantly using the 2x on the 70-200II in less than bright conditions. The second is autofocus the III has much better autofocus performance than the II. I need more reach. IMG9.src = 'https://media.the-digital-picture.com/Images/Other/Canon-Extender-EF-III/14x-Extender-20x.jpg' The following list of discontinued lenses fitting these parameters are compatible, but may require camera microfocus calibration for accurate focusing (note that not all DSLR cameras support microfocus calibration): Canon EF 200mm f/1.8 L USM Lens But, saving money is one of the reasons to buy an extender instead of a lens with a longer native focal length. At best, using a 2.0x extender with older lens designs will result in having only one available AF point. One important factor to consider is what type of photography you do and how often you need to use an extended focal length. IMG7.src = 'https://media.the-digital-picture.com/Images/Other/Canon-Extender-EF-III/No-Extender-14x.jpg' The Canon EF extender has II teleconverters that are fully compatible with a number of EF lenses. I own the 1.4 III extender, and am looking at getting a 2x. I have the 70-200mm f/2.8L IS II USM lens, so after reading the replies I think I've decided on the 2x III. IMG5.src = 'https://media.the-digital-picture.com/Images/Other/Canon-Extender-EF-III/14x-Extender-100.jpg' Here are some tips to get you started. Entdecke Canon Extender EF 1.4X III Telekonverter - fast neuwertig - #104 in groer Auswahl Vergleichen Angebote und Preise Online kaufen bei eBay Kostenlose Lieferung fr viele Artikel! -- ExtenderEF 1.4x II: Canon extenders simply do not fit behind the rear lens element on Canon's non-extender-compatible lenses. Canon TS-E 45mm f/2.8 Tilt-Shift Lens Here is the list of these lens reviews which is also the comprehensive-at-review-time list of currently available extender compatible Canon lenses. In fact when the 1.4x II was released, it was said that weather sealing was added, superior optical coatings, but the lens assembly was unchanged. //End comment tag.-->, Bringing you this site is my full-time job (typically 60-80 hours per week). but as their image quality results shown on their reviews show, they can function with extenders. IMG2 = new Image(604, 404) Tome Rodrigo 14.1K subscribers Subscribe 44K views 6 years ago Here I am showing if you can stack Canon Mark III. Has anyone out there tried both and able to offer an insight into whether the paying extra for the newer version is worthwhile? My extender purchase advice is similar to the advice I gave in the Canon 1.4x EF Extender III Review. Note that Canon does not recommend stacking extenders. I have the 70-200 2.8L IS II and the TC-1.4 III that mounted on a 7D I use for sports. 1st it's a hobby Thanks, Your best option is to sell the 400/5.6 and pick up a 5/600/F4 and 1.4x III. This content may contain affiliate links. Its also interesting to note that in this picture of the new hard case for the 400mm , there are dedicated slots for the extenders to fit in to. If price isnt an issue, go for the Canon 1.4 Extender III. The 2x III grew 2.6 oz (75g) heavier than, and is .21" (5.3mm) shorter than, the When Extender EF 2X III is used, AF drive speed is reduced by 75%. Its almost totally clean ! The price difference between 1.4 x and 2 x isn't much, so weighing up the pro's and cons of 1.4 x vs 2 x and II vs III. . Next best option is to keep the 400/5.6 and use it with the 1.4x III. IMG5 = new Image(604, 404) Excellent sharpness and details at F/5.6 . into a 140-400mm f/5.6 IS lens (yes, IS still functions normally on all compatible IS lenses). GEAR LISTCDS' HOT LINKSJake Hegnauer Photography. Another key difference is that the II has a maximum magnification of 0.7x, while the III has a maximum magnification of 0.5x. Canon TS-E 17mm f/4L Tilt-Shift Lens Is the Canon 1.4 Extender III still a good option for you? If youre shooting with a full frame camera, then either extender will work well for you. Heres a quick compatibility chart to help you out. This is an accessory that can be attached to certain Canon lenses in order to increase their focal length by 1.4x. I would defy any one of them to find the shots in which I have used them! This teleconverter will also decrease the sharpness of your images due to added optics, so its best used when shooting at lower resolutions or for less critical applications. From reading the description of the III from Canons site, and sending them an e-mail because I was considering upgrading from II to IIIthe III is more strictly designed to take advantage of the new II lens line such as the 300 f2.8 II or the 70-200 f2.8 II etc. Using extenders to save space when traveling or hiking can be a good decision. So, which one should you buy? So if you have a crop sensor camera or one of Canons mirrorless cameras, youll need to look elsewhere for an extender solution. I've even considered getting Kenko TC's so I can use one on lenses like my 100mmL which does not work with Canon TC's. IMG11.src = 'https://media.the-digital-picture.com/Images/Other/Canon-Extender-EF-III/Canon-Extender-EF-1.4x-III-On-Camera.jpg' In addition to having an impact on effective aperture, extenders can also impact the number of available AF points. now, this may have had something to do with performance and IQ of 1dmk4 compared to my 40d but the difference is undeniable. I could not see an appreciable difference in the AF speed and accuracy at all when used with current lenses. Lets move on though and look at that MKIII 2x Extender. But, Canon does not recommend using ETs at all due to reduced autofocus accuracy. Results will of course vary depending on which lens you are attaching the extenders too. A step up!! Others might find that the drop in sharpness isnt worth the extra reach. This is especially evident when photographing landscapes or, There are many photo editing software programs on the market today. The very long focal length lenses are considerably more expensive than extenders. With the MKIII T-Cons and the most modern DSLR AF Systems these "brakes" were finally removed. The difference in framing (angle of view) is quite noticeable between the three examples shown. L's 35-350 , 70-200 MK II IS What is your point? But I notice no slow down in AF on the new 70-200 mk II . they auto-focused just like with a bare lens.I can not see a difference in IQ. Built with Divi. Compared to the Mark II Extenders, these new Mark III Extenders will offer increased AF performance with all EF lenses. 1.4 extender I vs. II vs. III 12 posts, 1 page 1 AntonLargiader Goldmember 2,570 posts Gallery: 1 photo Likes: 250 Joined Oct 2010 Location: Charlottesville, VA More info Mar 08, 2011 08:44 | #1 There's a MkI for sale near me. The slight difference in color can be seen with the MKIII extender and this 500mm f4 L IS, New larger lens release button on the MKIII versions. IMG12.src = 'https://media.the-digital-picture.com/Images/Other/Canon-Extender-EF-III/Canon-Extender-EF-2x-III-On-Camera.jpg' Do you need more macro magnification from your Canon EF 180mm f/3.5L Lens? At review time, the price differential between the still-available version II extenders and the version IIIs is rather high. That can be very useful for wildlife or sports photography when you want to get just a little closer without spending money on an entirely new and longer lens. CorrectYou can always use the kenko TCs, Sebastien5D mkIII ; 17-40L ; 24-105L ; 70-200L II ; 70-300L ; 35L ; 85/1.4 ; 135L ; 100macro ; Kenko 1.4x ; 2x mkIII ; 580EXIIM5 ; M1 ; 11-22 ; 18-150 ; 22/2.0 ; EF adapter; Manfrotto LEDBenron Tripod; ThinkTank, Lowepro and Crumpler bags; Fjllrven backpack. Two additional lenses in the same number of groups (9/5 vs. 7/5) are found in the III (and likely contribute to the slightly increased weight). There is very little difference to be seen in these samples but as I mentioned before , I feel that in my real world shots the MKIII was very slightly ahead in contrast at lower apertures. And as stated he didn't say thats the lens he would be using the TC with. Often better (when available) is to use Live View AF, which is generally supported with f/11 max aperture lens combinations. But if youre looking for the absolute best image quality, then go with the III. Canon EF 400mm f/2.8L IS II USM Lens, IMG2.src = 'https://media.the-digital-picture.com/Images/Other/Canon-Extender-EF-III/14x-Extender.jpg' I should have made that clear in my first discussion. Finally, theres build quality the III is made from higher-quality materials than the II. Canon EF 2x II Lens Extender Converter EXCELLENT EOS DIGITAL Camera l. $187.11 + $9.72 shipping. Whats worth noting from this example is that the overall light level is much less. Canon 1dmk4 , iso800, f11 , 1/2000 , 600mm (300mm f2.8 L IS + 2x MKII extender). And, that's pretty much it. Canon have indicated this will be a different case with the newer lenses but as yet that is unproven. . It multiplies your focal length by 2x and makes your effective aperture two stops less. This for me is more impressive. Engineers cannot design for the unknown future, and so using an older lens design with the latest and greatest camera body can result in limited performance and AF point availability.The 7D2 has only one f/8 AF point, the center AF point. which can make it appear to resolve more detail. So there is some new technology hidden inside these things that we have yet to unlock and as such I cant really comment on that new aspect. While both brands produce great colors, I think Nikon has the edge. Recommended RF Lenses to take on an African Safari. The only difference I know of between the first and 2nd Canon 1.4x TC is weather sealing, no optical difference. TT1/TT5 . Canon EF 70-200mm f/4.0L USM Lens I believe it will also autofocus faster with certain newer lenses like the 70-200f/2.8L II IS and the II Super Telephotos. Canon EF 400mm f/2.8L IS USM Lens | Hosted by Kinsta. There was little implied IQ improvement by Canon using the older super telephotos or zooms with the version III TCs. 03/30/2023: Product Advisory for EF50 F1.2 L USM. The RF 2x actually performs pretty much identically to the two 1.4x TCs stacked (which yields the same final 2x magnification as the 2x TC). Due to the nature of the work (and the fact that I was working) , it wasnt possible to do comparative photos tediously switching from one extender to the next. IMG4 = new Image(604, 404) A teleconverter is an optical device that increase the effective focal length of a camera lens. Heres a breakdown of each lens to help you decide which one is right. Were certainly not talking leaps and bounds in improvements here but I feel that there is definitely an improvement that can be noticed to someone who has shot a lot with the older MKIIs. I had my camera set to AI Servo. The Canon Extender EF 1.4x II. BUT, ONLY If you had all three of the correct ingredients to make this work;- You had to have the most modern af system in the most up to date bodies. Essentially, it magnifies the image that your lens is able to capture. In June 2011 I had the opportunity to head to France and shoot the 24 Hours of Le Mans, the worlds greatest motor race. The new mark iii 1.4x teleconverter is head and shoulders above the previous versions. In the Canon EOS system, this is done by deliberately reducing drive speed when an extender is detected. In fact, many lenses wont autofocus at all when an Extender is attached- meaning youll have to focus manually every time. Free shipping for many products! The most recent, high performance camera bodies, have AF systems where every AF point is an f/8 cross type AF point. The above images (of a Christmas Cactus flower) were taken from the same tripod-mounted position (using the tripod ring) with a Anyone whos into photography knows that Canon makes great camera equipment.